It starts with consistent efficacy and safety observed in real-world patients

OPERA: Efficacy

OPERA is a real-world study of adult participants who switched to CABENUVA or a new oral ART regimen1,2

  • OPERA Study Design

    OPERA includes routine clinical data from electronic health records* from 101 clinics across 23 US states and territories

    OPERA study design graphic
    Endpoints and censoring criteria for patients in the OPERA study
    • Overall, the OPERA database represents ~14% of people with HIV in the US
    Endpoints and censoring criteria for patients in the OPERA study
    Real-World studies disclaimer
    1. Includes patients switched to CABENUVA or a new oral ART regimen between January 21, 2021, and December 31, 2022.
    2. Suppression defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL.
  • OPERA Baseline Characteristics

    Demographics and baseline characteristics

    OPERA study demographics and baseline characteristics for CABENUVA vs Oral ART
    1. Due to data missing in the electronic health records, n=133 (race), 132 (ethnicity) were excluded from the calculation.

OPERA Efficacy

OPERA: Switching to CABENUVA showed similarly high rates of maintaining virologic suppression vs a new daily oral therapy

OPERA study virologic suppression efficacy chart for CABENUVA vs daily oral therapy

Similar rate of CVF observed between participants switching to CABENUVA or a new oral therapy

(adjusted OR [95% CI] = 0.64 [0.40 to 1.02])

OPERA CVF rate for CABENUVA patients and oral therapy arm patients

CVF was defined as 2 HIV-1 RNA measurements 
>200 copies/mL or 1 HIV-1 RNA >200 copies/mL
plus discontinuation.

  • Following CVF, patients in each group had similar rates of virologic re-suppression
  • The most common regimens switched to were oral, INSTI-based regimens

Real-world studies are designed to evaluate associations among variables and not to definitively establish causality. These results of OPERA and BEYOND are descriptive.

  1. Virologic suppression was defined as HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL.
  2. Among those with a viral load available post-CVF, HIV-1 RNA <200 copies/mL: 95% (18/19) of patients previously treated with CABENUVA and 84% (36/43) of those previously treated with oral ART. HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL: 79% (15/19) of patients 
previously treated with CABENUVA and 72% (31/43) of those previously treated with oral ART.

OPERA: Safety

  • No safety or discontinuation data reported

Expert Perspectives: Conversations On CABENUVA

CABENUVA: From Clinical Trials 
to Real-World Application

As the principal investigator of OPERA, Dr. Hsu reviews OPERA and BEYOND, two studies evaluating the use of CABENUVA in the real world. Additionally, patient preference data from BEYOND are discussed. Dr. Hsu also shares his key clinical insights on the significance of real-world evidence and clinical trials like SOLAR, for which he provides a brief overview.

Speaker has been compensated by ViiV Healthcare.

Real-world evidence from OPERA reinforces results from SOLAR

AE=adverse event; ART=antiretroviral therapy; ARV=antiretroviral; CAB=CABENUVA; CI=confidence interval; CVF=confirmed virologic failure; eCRF=electronic case report form; INSTI=integrase strand-transfer inhibitor; IQR=interquartile range; ISR=injection site reaction; M=month; n=number; NNRTI=non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; OR=odds ratio; PI=protease inhibitor; SD=standard deviation.

References:

  1. Hsu RK, Sension M, Fusco JS, et al. Real-world effectiveness of cabotegravir + rilpivirine vs standard of care oral regimens in the US. Poster presented at: Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI); March 3-6, 2024; Denver CO.
  2. Data on file. ViiV Healthcare group of companies. Durham, NC.

PMUS-CBRWCNT240094